The tradeoff is complexity. The microcode must be carefully arranged so that the instructions in delay slots are either useful setup for both paths, or at least harmless if the redirect fires. Not every case is as clean as RETF. When a PLA redirect interrupts an LCALL, the return address is already pushed onto the microcode call stack (yes, the 386 has a microcode call stack) -- the redirected code must account for this stale entry. When multiple protection tests overlap, or when a redirect fires during a delay slot of another jump, the control flow becomes hard to reason about. During the FPGA core implementation, protection delay slot interactions were consistently the most difficult bugs to track down.
# Switch to unrestricted，更多细节参见旺商聊官方下载
，推荐阅读爱思助手下载最新版本获取更多信息
"On a simple level, you can use sheets or covers over areas where things might be damaged. You can put wax coating on things like brass so that the urine doesn't damage it."
A pair like Cyrillic ԁ (U+0501) and Latin d scores 0.781 mean SSIM across 18 fonts. That sounds moderate. But it is pixel-identical (SSIM 1.000) in eight of those fonts: Arial, Menlo, Cochin, Tahoma, Charter, Georgia, Baskerville, and Verdana. An attacker needs only one font to succeed. The exploitable risk is the max, not the mean.，更多细节参见服务器推荐